Cultural psychology heine pdf download

Toggle navigation. Main Cultural Psychology. Cultural Psychology Steven J. ISBN Your tags:. Send-to-Kindle or Email Please login to your account first Need help? Please read our short guide how to send a book to Kindle. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

DOI: Heine and Matthew B. Heine , M. Ruby Published Medicine Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science Humans are a cultural species, constantly navigating a complex web of culturally bound practices, norms, and worldviews. This article provides a brief overview of the relatively young field of cultural psychology, which investigates the many ways psychology and culture interweave with one another. Highlighting the cultural nature of the human species, it draws upon research on cultural evolution, enculturation, and developmental processes.

This review further summarizes a number of cultural… Expand. View on PubMed. Save to Library Save. Create Alert Alert. Share This Paper.

Background Citations. Methods Citations. Results Citations. Topics from this paper. Citation Type. Zhang, J. When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63 12 , — Download references. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Correspondence to Young-Hoon Kim. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board. The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the data.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Reprints and Permissions. Nam, Y. Do you favor positive information or dislike negative information? Cultural variations in the derivation of the framing effect. Curr Psychol Download citation. Accepted : 26 November Published : 06 January Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search SpringerLink Search. Abstract Individuals, despite having practically identical choices, often evaluate one option as being more favorable when described in a positive vs. Notes 1. References Aaker, J. Article Google Scholar Baumeister, R. Article Google Scholar Boseovski, J. Article Google Scholar Buda, R. Article Google Scholar Cheng, F. Article Google Scholar Elliot, A. Article Google Scholar Gamliel, E.

Google Scholar Guan, Y. Article Google Scholar Heine, S. Article Google Scholar Hong, Y. Article Google Scholar Isaac, M. Article Google Scholar Kahneman, D. Article Google Scholar Kreiner, H. Article Google Scholar Krishnamurthy, P. Article Google Scholar Leong, L. Article Google Scholar Levin, I. Article Google Scholar Lee, A. Article Google Scholar Liu, D. Article Google Scholar Markus, H. Article Google Scholar Morrison, D. Article Google Scholar Nisbett, R.

Google Scholar Rahman, S. Article Google Scholar Rozin, P. Article Google Scholar Tokar, T. Article Google Scholar Xu, J.

Article Google Scholar Zhang, J. Article Google Scholar Download references. View author publications. Ethics Approval The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board. Consent to Participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the data.